English

Orientable convexity, geodetic and hull numbers in graphs

Combinatorics 2007-05-23 v1

Abstract

We prove three results conjectured or stated by Chartrand, Fink and Zhang [European J. Combin {\bf 21} (2000) 181--189, Disc. Appl. Math. {\bf 116} (2002) 115--126, and pre-print of ``The hull number of an oriented graph'']. For a digraph DD, Chartrand et al. defined the geodetic, hull and convexity number -- g(D)g(D), h(D)h(D) and con(D)con(D), respectively. For an undirected graph GG, g(G)g^{-}(G) and g+(G)g^{+}(G) are the minimum and maximum geodetic numbers over all orientations of GG, and similarly for h(G)h^{-}(G), h+(G)h^{+}(G), con(G)con^{-}(G) and con+(G)con^{+}(G). Chartrand and Zhang gave a proof that g(G)<g+(G)g^{-}(G) < g^{+}(G) for any connected graph with at least three vertices. We plug a gap in their proof, allowing us also to establish their conjecture that h(G)<h+(G)h^{-}(G) < h^{+}(G). If vv is an end-vertex, then in any orientation of GG, vv is either a source or a sink. It is easy to see that graphs without end-vertices can be oriented to have no source or sink; we show that, in fact, we can avoid all extreme vertices. This proves another conjecture of Chartrand et al., that con(G)<con+(G)con^{-}(G) < con^{+}(G) iff GG has no end-vertices.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.math/0306367,
  title  = {Orientable convexity, geodetic and hull numbers in graphs},
  author = {Alastair Farrugia},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:math/0306367},
  year   = {2007}
}

Comments

8 pages, 1 figure; submitted to European Journal of Combinatorics

R2 v1 2026-07-22T16:55:42.769Z