English

Optimal Infinity-Quasiconformal Immersions

Analysis of PDEs 2014-07-21 v4 Geometric Topology

Abstract

For a Hamiltonian KC2(RN×n)K \in C^2(\mathbb{R}^{N \times n}) and a map u:ΩRnRNu:\Omega \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}^N, we consider the supremal functional \label1E(u,Ω) := K(Du)L(Ω).(1) \label{1} \tag{1} E_\infty (u,\Omega) \ :=\ \big\|K(Du)\big\|_{L^\infty(\Omega)} . The "Euler-Lagrange" PDE associated to \eqref{1} is the quasilinear system \label2Au:=(KPKP+K[KP]KPP)(Du):D2u=0.(2) \label{2} A_\infty u \, :=\, \Big(K_P \otimes K_P + K[K_P]^\bot K_{PP}\Big)(Du):D^2 u \, = \, 0. \tag{2} Here KPK_P is the derivative and [KP][K_P]^\bot is the projection on its nullspace. \eqref{1} and \eqref{2} are the fundamental objects of vector-valued Calculus of Variations in LL^\infty and first arose in recent work of the author \cite{K1}-\cite{K6}. Herein we apply our results to Geometric Analysis by choosing as KK the dilation function K(P)=P2det(PP)1/n K(P)={|P|^2}{\det(P^\top P)^{-1/n}} which measures the deviation of uu from being conformal. Our main result is that appropriately defined minimisers of \eqref{1} solve \eqref{2}. Hence, PDE methods can be used to study optimised quasiconformal maps. Nonconvexity of KK and appearance of interfaces where [KP][K_P]^\bot is discontinuous cause extra difficulties. When n=Nn=N, this approach has previously been followed by Capogna-Raich \cite{CR} and relates to Teichm\"uller's theory. In particular, we disprove a conjecture appearing therein.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1206.6039,
  title  = {Optimal Infinity-Quasiconformal Immersions},
  author = {Nikos Katzourakis},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.6039},
  year   = {2014}
}

Comments

24 pages, 4 figures, to appear in ESAIM-COCV

R2 v1 2026-06-21T21:25:51.615Z