English

Optimal and Unbiased Fluxes from Up-the-Ramp Detectors under Variable Illumination

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics 2026-03-24 v2 Applications

Abstract

Near-infrared (NIR) detectors -- which use non-destructive readouts to measure time-series counts-per-pixel -- play a crucial role in modern astrophysics. Standard NIR flux extraction techniques were developed for space-based observations and assume that source fluxes are constant over an observation. However, ground-based telescopes often see short-timescale atmospheric variations that can dramatically change the number of photons arriving at a pixel. This work presents a new statistical model that shares information between neighboring spectral pixels to characterize time-variable observations and extract unbiased fluxes with optimal uncertainties. We generate realistic synthetic data using a variety of flux and amplitude-of-time-variability conditions to confirm that our model recovers unbiased and optimal estimates of both the true flux and the time-variable signal. We find that the time-variable model should be favored over a constant-flux model when the observed count rates change by more than 3.5%. Ignoring time variability in the data can result in flux-dependent, unknown-sign biases that are as large as ~120% of the flux uncertainty. Using real APOGEE spectra, we find empirical evidence for approximately wavelength-independent, time-dependent variations in count rates with amplitudes much greater than the 3.5% threshold. Our model can robustly measure and remove the time-dependence in real data, improving the quality of data-model comparison. We show several examples where the observed time-dependence quantitatively agrees with independent measurements of observing conditions, such as variable cloud cover and seeing.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2601.10878,
  title  = {Optimal and Unbiased Fluxes from Up-the-Ramp Detectors under Variable Illumination},
  author = {Bowen Li and Kevin A. McKinnon and Andrew K. Saydjari and Conor Sayres and Gwendolyn M. Eadie and Andrew R. Casey and Jon A. Holtzman and Timothy D. Brandt and Jose G. Fernandez-Trincado},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.10878},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

22 pages, 20 figures