English

Optimal analysis of the CMB trispectrum

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2015-02-04 v1

Abstract

We develop a general framework for data analysis and phenomenology of the CMB four-point function or trispectrum. To lowest order in the derivative expansion, the inflationary action admits three quartic operators consistent with symmetry: σ˙4\dot\sigma^4, σ˙2(σ2)\dot\sigma^2 (\partial\sigma^2), and (σ)4(\partial\sigma)^4. In single field inflation, only the first of these operators can be the leading non-Gaussian signal. A Fisher matrix analysis shows that there is one near-degeneracy among the three CMB trispectra, so we parameterize the trispectrum with two coefficients gNLσ˙4g_{NL}^{\dot\sigma^4} and gNL(σ)4g_{NL}^{(\partial\sigma)^4}, in addition to the coefficient gNLlocg_{NL}^{\rm loc} of ζ3\zeta^3-type local non-Gaussianity. This three-parameter space is analogous to the parameter space (fNLloc,fNLequil,fNLorth)(f_{NL}^{\rm loc}, f_{NL}^{\rm equil}, f_{NL}^{\rm orth}) commonly used to parameterize the CMB three-point function. We next turn to data analysis and show how to represent these trispectra in a factorizable form which leads to computationally fast operations such as evaluating a CMB estimator or simulating a non-Gaussian CMB. We discuss practical issues in CMB analysis pipelines, and perform an optimal analysis of WMAP data. Our minimum-variance estimates are gNLloc=(3.80±2.19)×105g_{NL}^{\rm loc} = (-3.80 \pm 2.19) \times 10^5, gNLσ˙4=(3.20±3.09)×106g_{NL}^{\dot\sigma^4} = (-3.20 \pm 3.09) \times 10^6, and gNL(σ)4=(10.8±6.33)×105g_{NL}^{(\partial\sigma)^4} = (-10.8 \pm 6.33) \times 10^5 after correcting for the effects of CMB lensing. No evidence of a nonzero inflationary four-point function is seen.

Cite

@article{arxiv.1502.00635,
  title  = {Optimal analysis of the CMB trispectrum},
  author = {Kendrick M. Smith and Leonardo Senatore and Matias Zaldarriaga},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.00635},
  year   = {2015}
}

Comments

35 pages

R2 v1 2026-06-22T08:19:39.470Z