English

Optical response in Weyl semimetal in model with gapped Dirac phase

Strongly Correlated Electrons 2017-10-11 v1 Disordered Systems and Neural Networks Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics

Abstract

We study the optical properties of Weyl semimetal (WSM) in a model which features, in addition to the usual term describing isolated Dirac cones proportional to the Fermi velocity vFv_{F}, a gap term mm and a Zeeman spin-splitting term bb with broken time reversal symmetry. Transport is treated within Kubo formalism and particular attention is payed to the modifications that result from a finite mm and bb. We consider how these modifications change when a finite residual scattering rate Γ\Gamma is included. For Γ<m\Gamma<m the A.C. conductivity as a function of photon energy Ω\Omega continues to display the two quasilinear energy regions of the clean limit for Ω\Omega below the onset of the second electronic band which is gapped at (m+b m+b ). For Γ\Gamma of the order mm little trace of two distinct linear energy scales remain and the optical response has evolved towards that for m=b=0m=b=0. Although some quantitative differences remain there are no qualitative differences. The magnitude of the D.C. conductivity σDC(T=0)\sigma^{DC}(T=0) at zero temperature (T=0T=0) and chemical potential (μ=0\mu=0) is altered. While it remains proportional to Γ\Gamma it becomes inversely dependent on an effective Fermi velocity out of the Weyl nodes equal to vF=vFb2m2/bv_{F}^\ast=v_{F}\sqrt{b^2-m^2}/b which decreases strongly as the phase boundary between Weyl semimetal and gapped Dirac phase (GDSM) is approached at b=mb=m. The leading term in the approach to σDC(T=0)\sigma^{DC}(T=0) for finite T/ΓT/\Gamma, μ/Γ\mu/\Gamma and Ω/Γ\Omega/\Gamma is found to be quadratic. The coefficient of these corrections tracks closely the b/mb/m dependence of the μ=T=Ω=0\mu=T=\Omega=0 limit with differences largest near to the WSM-GDSM boundary.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1706.09353,
  title  = {Optical response in Weyl semimetal in model with gapped Dirac phase},
  author = {S. P. Mukherjee and J. P. Carbotte},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.09353},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

13 pages 9 figures

R2 v1 2026-06-22T20:32:24.129Z