English

Opinion inertia and coarsening in the Persistent Voter model

Physics and Society 2025-03-24 v2 Statistical Mechanics

Abstract

We consider the Persistent Voter model (PVM), a variant of the Voter model (VM) that includes transient, dynamically-induced zealots. Due to peer reinforcement, the internal confidence ηi\eta_i of a normal voter increases by steps of size Δη\Delta\eta and once it gets above a given threshold, it becomes a zealot. Then, its opinion remains frozen until enough interactions with the opposite opinion occur and its confidence is reset. No longer a zealot, the regular voter may change opinion once again. This opinion inertia mechanism, albeit simplified, is responsible for an effective surface tension and the PVM has a crossover from a fluctuation-driven dynamics, as in the VM, to a curvature-driven one, as in the Ising Model at low temperature (IM0). The average time τ\tau to attain consensus is non-monotonic on Δη\Delta\eta and has a minimum at Δηmin\Delta\eta_{\min}. In this paper we clarify the mechanisms that accelerate the system towards consensus close to Δηmin\Delta\eta_{\min}. Close to the crossover at Δηmin\Delta\eta_{\min}, the intermediate region around the domains where the regular voters accumulate (the active region, AR) is large and the surface tension, albeit small, is still enough to keep the shape and reduce the fragmentation of the domains. The large size of the AR in the region of Δηmin\Delta\eta_{\min} has two important effects that accelerates the dynamics. First, it dislodges the zealots in the bulk of the domains and second, it maximally suppresses the slowly-evolving stripes that normally form in Ising-like models. This suggests the importance of understanding the role of the AR, where the change of opinion is facilitated, and the interplay between regular voters and zealots when attempting to disrupt polarized states.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2403.02483,
  title  = {Opinion inertia and coarsening in the Persistent Voter model},
  author = {Luis Carlos F. Latoski and W. G. Dantas and Jeferson J. Arenzon},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.02483},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

8 pages