OpenKBP-Opt: An international and reproducible evaluation of 76 knowledge-based planning pipelines
Abstract
We establish an open framework for developing plan optimization models for knowledge-based planning (KBP) in radiotherapy. Our framework includes reference plans for 100 patients with head-and-neck cancer and high-quality dose predictions from 19 KBP models that were developed by different research groups during the OpenKBP Grand Challenge. The dose predictions were input to four optimization models to form 76 unique KBP pipelines that generated 7600 plans. The predictions and plans were compared to the reference plans via: dose score, which is the average mean absolute voxel-by-voxel difference in dose a model achieved; the deviation in dose-volume histogram (DVH) criterion; and the frequency of clinical planning criteria satisfaction. We also performed a theoretical investigation to justify our dose mimicking models. The range in rank order correlation of the dose score between predictions and their KBP pipelines was 0.50 to 0.62, which indicates that the quality of the predictions is generally positively correlated with the quality of the plans. Additionally, compared to the input predictions, the KBP-generated plans performed significantly better (P<0.05; one-sided Wilcoxon test) on 18 of 23 DVH criteria. Similarly, each optimization model generated plans that satisfied a higher percentage of criteria than the reference plans. Lastly, our theoretical investigation demonstrated that the dose mimicking models generated plans that are also optimal for a conventional planning model. This was the largest international effort to date for evaluating the combination of KBP prediction and optimization models. In the interest of reproducibility, our data and code is freely available at https://github.com/ababier/open-kbp-opt.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2202.08303,
title = {OpenKBP-Opt: An international and reproducible evaluation of 76 knowledge-based planning pipelines},
author = {Aaron Babier and Rafid Mahmood and Binghao Zhang and Victor G. L. Alves and Ana Maria Barragán-Montero and Joel Beaudry and Carlos E. Cardenas and Yankui Chang and Zijie Chen and Jaehee Chun and Kelly Diaz and Harold David Eraso and Erik Faustmann and Sibaji Gaj and Skylar Gay and Mary Gronberg and Bingqi Guo and Junjun He and Gerd Heilemann and Sanchit Hira and Yuliang Huang and Fuxin Ji and Dashan Jiang and Jean Carlo Jimenez Giraldo and Hoyeon Lee and Jun Lian and Shuolin Liu and Keng-Chi Liu and José Marrugo and Kentaro Miki and Kunio Nakamura and Tucker Netherton and Dan Nguyen and Hamidreza Nourzadeh and Alexander F. I. Osman and Zhao Peng and José Darío Quinto Muñoz and Christian Ramsl and Dong Joo Rhee and Juan David Rodriguez and Hongming Shan and Jeffrey V. Siebers and Mumtaz H. Soomro and Kay Sun and Andrés Usuga Hoyos and Carlos Valderrama and Rob Verbeek and Enpei Wang and Siri Willems and Qi Wu and Xuanang Xu and Sen Yang and Lulin Yuan and Simeng Zhu and Lukas Zimmermann and Kevin L. Moore and Thomas G. Purdie and Andrea L. McNiven and Timothy C. Y. Chan},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.08303},
year = {2022}
}
Comments
19 pages, 7 tables, 6 figures