English

Online Shadow Tomography Matching the Classical Bounds

Quantum Physics 2026-07-31 v1 Data Structures and Algorithms

Abstract

In \emph{Online Shadow Tomography}, we are given copies of an unknown dd-dimensional quantum state ρ\rho, an adversary (adaptively) proposes a sequence of bounded observables A(1),,A(m)A^{(1)},\ldots,A^{(m)}, and after each A(t)A^{(t)} is given we must estimate \Tr(A(t)ρ)\Tr(A^{(t)}\rho) to within ±ϵ\pm \epsilon. This is the direct quantum generalization of the classical problem of \emph{Adaptive Data Analysis}. %The ``offline'' case, in which A(1),,A(m)A^{(1)}, \ldots, A^{(m)} are given upfront, is also a well-studied problem. The main goal is to minimize the number of copies, nn, required. Prior results for online Shadow Tomography were suboptimal in all three parameters m,d,ϵm, d, \epsilon, lagging behind the best known and classical rates~\cite{bassily2021algorithmic}, for which there is some evidence of optimality. In this work, we finally close this gap, giving a pair of algorithms matching the classical rates. The bound on the left is the first to achieve o(log2m)o(\log^2 m)-dependence together with \poly(log(d)/\eps)\poly(\log(d)/\eps); moreover, it improves all three exponents even in the \emph{Offline} Shadow Tomography setting. The bound on the right is known to be optimal among bounds independent of~dd, and improves the best prior result by a mlogm\sqrt{m} \log m factor. The key to our proof is a new framework for quantifying post-measurement damage, based on the quantum Efron--Stein decomposition.

Cite

@article{arxiv.2607.29686,
  title  = {Online Shadow Tomography Matching the Classical Bounds},
  author = {Sitan Chen and Ryan O'Donnell and Angelos Pelecanos and John Wright},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.29686},
  year   = {2026}
}