English

On the wave optics effect on primordial black hole constraints from optical microlensing search

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2020-03-31 v3

Abstract

Microlensing of stars, e.g. in the Galactic bulge and Andromeda galaxy (M31), is among the most robust, powerful method to constrain primordial black holes (PBHs) that are a viable candidate of dark matter. If PBHs are in the mass range M_{\rm PBH} \lower.5ex\hbox{\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;} 10^{-10}M_\odot, its Schwarzschild radius (rSchr_{\rm Sch}) becomes comparable with or shorter than optical wavelength (λ)\lambda) used in a microlensing search, and in this regime the wave optics effect on microlensing needs to be taken into account. For a lensing PBH with mass satisfying rSchλr_{\rm Sch}\sim \lambda, it causes a characteristic oscillatory feature in the microlensing light curve, and it will give a smoking gun evidence of PBH if detected, because any astrophysical object cannot have such a tiny Schwarzschild radius. Even in a statistical study, e.g. constraining the abundance of PBHs from a systematic search of microlensing events for a sample of many source stars, the wave effect needs to be taken into account. We examine the impact of wave effect on the PBH constraints obtained from the rr-band (6210\AA) monitoring observation of M31 stars in Niikura et al. (2019), and find that a finite source size effect is dominant over the wave effect for PBHs in the mass range MPBH[1011,1010]MM_{\rm PBH}\simeq[10^{-11},10^{-10}]M_\odot. We also discuss that, if a denser-cadence (10~sec), gg-band monitoring observation for a sample of white dwarfs over a year timescale is available, it would allow one to explore the wave optics effect on microlensing light curve, if it occurs, or improve the PBH constraints in M_{\rm PBH}\lower.5ex\hbox{\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;} 10^{-11}M_\odot even from a null detection.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1905.06066,
  title  = {On the wave optics effect on primordial black hole constraints from optical microlensing search},
  author = {Sunao Sugiyama and Toshiki Kurita and Masahiro Takada},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.06066},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

Accepted for publication in MNRAS; 10 pages, 8 figures. Typos are corrected. Fig.4 is newly added