On the Usefulness of Promises
Abstract
A Boolean predicate is defined to be promise-useful if is tractable for some non-trivial and otherwise it is promise-useless. We initiate investigations of this notion and derive sufficient conditions for both promise-usefulness and promise-uselessness (assuming ). While we do not obtain a complete characterization, our conditions are sufficient to classify all predicates of arity at most and almost all predicates of arity . We also derive asymptotic results to show that for large arities a vast majority of all predicates are promise-useless. Our results are primarily obtained by a thorough study of the "Promise-SAT" problem, in which we are given a -SAT instance with the promise that there is a satisfying assignment for which the literal values of each clause satisfy some additional constraint. The algorithmic results are based on the basic LP + affine IP algorithm of Brakensiek et al. (SICOMP, 2020) while we use a number of novel criteria to establish NP-hardness.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2511.21450,
title = {On the Usefulness of Promises},
author = {Per Austrin and Johan Håstad and Björn Martinsson},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21450},
year = {2025}
}