English

On the union of intersecting families

Combinatorics 2019-10-09 v4

Abstract

A family of sets is said to be \emph{intersecting} if any two sets in the family have nonempty intersection. In 1973, Erd\H{o}s raised the problem of determining the maximum possible size of a union of rr different intersecting families of kk-element subsets of an nn-element set, for each triple of integers (n,k,r)(n,k,r). We make progress on this problem, proving that for any fixed integer r2r \geq 2 and for any k(12o(1))nk \leq (\tfrac{1}{2}-o(1))n, if XX is an nn-element set, and F=F1F2Fr\mathcal{F} = \mathcal{F}_1 \cup \mathcal{F}_2 \cup \ldots \cup \mathcal{F}_r, where each Fi\mathcal{F}_i is an intersecting family of kk-element subsets of XX, then F(nk)(nrk)|\mathcal{F}| \leq {n \choose k} - {n-r \choose k}, with equality only if F={SX: S=k, SR}\mathcal{F} = \{S \subset X:\ |S|=k,\ S \cap R \neq \emptyset\} for some RXR \subset X with R=r|R|=r. This is best possible up to the size of the o(1)o(1) term, and improves a 1987 result of Frankl and F\"uredi, who obtained the same conclusion under the stronger hypothesis k<(35)n/2k < (3-\sqrt{5})n/2, in the case r=2r=2. Our proof utilises an isoperimetric, influence-based method recently developed by Keller and the authors.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1610.03027,
  title  = {On the union of intersecting families},
  author = {David Ellis and Noam Lifshitz},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.03027},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

13 pages. Updated references, expositional changes and minor corrections following the helpful comments of an anonymous referee