English

On the Survival of Cool Clouds in the Circum-Galactic Medium

Astrophysics of Galaxies 2020-01-08 v2

Abstract

We explore the survival of cool clouds in multi-phase circum-galactic media. We revisit the "cloud crushing problem" in a large survey of simulations including radiative cooling, self-shielding, self-gravity, magnetic fields, and anisotropic Braginskii conduction and viscosity (with saturation). We explore a wide range of parameters including cloud size, velocity, ambient temperature and density, as well as a variety of magnetic field configurations and cloud turbulence. We find that realistic magnetic fields and turbulence have weaker effects on cloud survival; the most important physics is radiative cooling and conduction. Self-gravity and self-shielding are important for clouds which are initially Jeans-unstable, but largely irrelevant otherwise. Non-self-gravitating, realistically magnetized clouds separate into four regimes: (1) At low column densities, clouds evaporate rapidly via conduction. (2) A "failed pressure confinement" regime, where the ambient hot gas cools too rapidly to provide pressure confinement for the cloud. (3) An "infinitely long-lived" regime, in which the cloud lifetime becomes longer than the cooling time of gas swept up in the leading bow shock, so the cloud begins to accrete and grow. (4) A "classical cloud destruction" regime, where clouds are eventually destroyed by instabilities. In the final regime, the cloud lifetime can exceed the naive cloud-crushing time owing to conduction-induced compression. However, small and/or slow-moving clouds can also evaporate more rapidly than the cloud-crushing time. We develop simple analytic models that explain the simulated cloud destruction times in this regime.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1909.02632,
  title  = {On the Survival of Cool Clouds in the Circum-Galactic Medium},
  author = {Zhihui Li and Philip F. Hopkins and Jonathan Squire and Cameron Hummels},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.02632},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

v1: 13 pages, 12 figures, submitted to MNRAS; v2: accepted version