On the Role of Directionality in Structural Generalization
Abstract
Several SLOG test categories explicitly involve directional distinctions (modifier position shifts, argument extraction positions), yet AM-Parser, the previous SOTA, uses an AM algebra whose operations do not encode direction. We redesign the symbolic backend around CCG directed types (deterministic CKY + single linear decoder, 30K learnable parameters). Under the same BERT-base encoder, the system achieves 75.96.4% LF exact match, surpassing AM-Parser (70.84.3%). Per SLOG's own category groupings, gains are highly directional: the CCG system outperforms AM-Parser on all 5 position-shift categories (+29.9pp), while AM-Parser outperforms on all 6 recursive-depth categories. Replacing the encoder with DeBERTa-v3-large yields 90.74.9%, with the largest encoder gains in recursive-depth categories, complementary to directionality's gains. Directional representations shift the bottleneck from the symbolic layer (AM-Parser's 0% category ceiling) to the neural layer, which improves with encoder upgrades.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2607.02307,
title = {On the Role of Directionality in Structural Generalization},
author = {Zichao Wei},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.02307},
year = {2026}
}