English

On the polemic assessment of what Bell did

Quantum Physics 2026-03-31 v3

Abstract

Despite their Nobel Prize-winning empirical falsification, the interpretation of Bell's inequality remains a subject of controversy. This article discusses and attempts to clarify the reasons John S. Bell and A. Einstein claimed that quantum entanglement implies puzzling nonlocal correlations that Einstein famously termed ``spooky action at a distance.'' The issue remains notoriously controversial and has roughly divided the scientific community into localists and nonlocalists. Without taking a stance on either side in the long-standing, polarized debate, we examine Bell's actual argument and highlight how his reasoning differs from the current orthodoxy.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2506.22915,
  title  = {On the polemic assessment of what Bell did},
  author = {Justo Pastor Lambare},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.22915},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

Accepted by Philosophical Problems in Science (Polish: Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce, abbrev. ZFN)