English

On the local Bump-Friedberg L-function

Number Theory 2013-07-30 v2

Abstract

Let FF be a pp-adic field. If π\pi be an irreducible representation of GL(n,F)GL(n,F), Bump and Friedberg associated to π\pi an Euler fator L(π,BF,s1,s2)L(\pi,BF,s_1,s_2) in \cite{BF}, that should be equal to L(ϕ(π),s1)L(ϕ(π),Λ2,s2)L(\phi(\pi),s_1)L(\phi(\pi),\Lambda^2,s_2), where ϕ(π)\phi(\pi) is the Langlands' parameter of π\pi. The main result of this paper is to show that this equality is true when (s1,s2)=(s+1/2,2s)(s_1,s_2)=(s+1/2,2s), for ss in \C\C. To prove this, we classify in terms of distinguished discrete series, generic representations of GL(n,F)GL(n,F) which are χα\chi_\alpha-distinguished by the Levi subgroup GL([(n+1)/2],F)×GL([n/2],F)GL([(n+1)/2],F) \times GL([n/2],F), for χα(g1,g2)=α(det(g1)/det(g2))\chi_\alpha(g_1,g_2)=\alpha(det(g_1)/det(g_2)), where α\alpha is a character of FF^* of real part between -1/2 and 1/2. We then adapt the technique of \cite{CP} to reduce the proof of the equality to the case of discrete series. The equality for discrete series is a consequence of the relation between linear periods and Shalika periods for discrete series, and the main result of \cite{KR}.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1301.0350,
  title  = {On the local Bump-Friedberg L-function},
  author = {Nadir Matringe},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.0350},
  year   = {2013}
}

Comments

We fixed a problem in the proof of Theorem 3.1, at the cost of making the assumption that $Re(\alpha)$ belongs to $[0,1/2]$ in the statement. This does not affect any other result

R2 v1 2026-06-21T23:03:10.508Z