English

On the Interface between Perturbative and Nonperturbative QCD

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2017-04-07 v3

Abstract

The QCD running coupling αs(Q2)\alpha_s(Q^2) sets the strength of the interactions of quarks and gluons as a function of the momentum transfer QQ. The Q2Q^2 dependence of the coupling is required to describe hadronic interactions at both large and short distances. In this article we adopt the light-front holographic approach to strongly-coupled QCD, a formalism which incorporates confinement, predicts the spectroscopy of hadrons composed of light quarks, and describes the low-Q2Q^2 analytic behavior of the strong coupling αs(Q2)\alpha_s(Q^2). The high-Q2Q^2 dependence of the coupling αs(Q2)\alpha_s(Q^2) is specified by perturbative QCD and its renormalization group equation. The matching of the high and low Q2Q^2 regimes of αs(Q2)\alpha_s(Q^2) then determines the scale Q0Q_0 which sets the interface between perturbative and nonperturbative hadron dynamics. The value of Q0Q_0 can be used to set the factorization scale for DGLAP evolution of hadronic structure functions and the ERBL evolution of distribution amplitudes. We discuss the scheme-dependence of the value of Q0Q_0 and the infrared fixed-point of the QCD coupling. Our analysis is carried out for the MSˉ\bar{MS}, g1g_1, MOMMOM and VV renormalization schemes. Our results show that the discrepancies on the value of αs\alpha_s at large distance seen in the literature can be explained by different choices of renormalization schemes. We also provide the formulae to compute αs(Q2)\alpha_s(Q^2) over the entire range of space-like momentum transfer for the different renormalization schemes discussed in this article.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1601.06568,
  title  = {On the Interface between Perturbative and Nonperturbative QCD},
  author = {A. Deur and S. J. Brodsky and G. F. de Teramond},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.06568},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

20 pages, 3 figures. V2: Version accepted for publication (Phys.Lett. B757 275 (2016)). V3: Corrected Fig.3 for wrong label (data were plotted vs Q, not Q^2)