English

On the equivalence of linear sets

Combinatorics 2015-10-07 v2

Abstract

Let LL be a linear set of pseudoregulus type in a line \ell in Σ=PG(t1,qt)\Sigma^*=\mathrm{PG}(t-1,q^t), t=5t=5 or t>6t>6. We provide examples of qq-order canonical subgeometries Σ1,Σ2Σ\Sigma_1,\, \Sigma_2 \subset \Sigma^* such that there is a (t3)(t-3)-space ΓΣ(Σ1Σ2)\Gamma \subset \Sigma^*\setminus (\Sigma_1 \cup \Sigma_2 \cup \ell) with the property that for i=1,2i=1,2, LL is the projection of Σi\Sigma_i from center Γ\Gamma and there exists no collineation ϕ\phi of Σ\Sigma^* such that Γϕ=Γ\Gamma^{\phi}=\Gamma and Σ1ϕ=Σ2\Sigma_1^{\phi}=\Sigma_2. Condition (ii) given in Theorem 3 in Lavrauw and Van de Voorde (Des. Codes Cryptogr. 56:89-104, 2010) states the existence of a collineation between the projecting configurations (each of them consisting of a center and a subgeometry), which give rise by means of projections to two linear sets. It follows from our examples that this condition is not necessary for the equivalence of two linear sets as stated there. We characterize the linear sets for which the condition above is actually necessary.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1501.03441,
  title  = {On the equivalence of linear sets},
  author = {Bence Csajbók and Corrado Zanella},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.03441},
  year   = {2015}
}

Comments

Preprint version. Referees' suggestions and corrections implemented. The final version is to appear in Designs, Codes and Cryptography

R2 v1 2026-06-22T08:01:34.598Z