On the Cryptographic Futility of Non-Collapsing Measurements
Abstract
We investigate quantum analogues of collision resistance and obtain separations between quantum ``one-way'' and ``collision-resistant'' primitives. 1. Our first result studies one-wayness versus collision-resistance defined over quantum circuits that output classical strings. We show that there is a classical oracle relative to which (sub-exponentially secure) indistinguishability obfuscation and one-way permutations exist even against adversaries that make quantum queries to a non-collapsing measurement oracle, . Very roughly, outputs the result of multiple non-collapsing measurements on the output of any quantum -aided circuit. This rules out fully black-box {\em quantum} constructions of from for any indistinguishability obfuscation and one-way permutations, public-key encryption, deniable encryption, oblivious transfer, non-interactive ZK, trapdoor permutations, quantum moneycollision-resistant hash functions, hard problems in SZK, homomorphic encryption, distributional collision-resistant puzzles. 2. Our second result studies one-wayness versus collision-resistance defined over quantum states. Here, we show that relative to the same classical oracle , (sub-exponentially secure) indistinguishability obfuscation and one-way permutations exist even against adversaries that make quantum queries to a {\em cloning unitary} . Very roughly, this latter oracle implements a well-defined, linear operation to clone a subset of the qubits output by any quantum -aided circuit. This rules out fully black-box constructions of quantum lightning from public-key quantum money.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2510.05055,
title = {On the Cryptographic Futility of Non-Collapsing Measurements},
author = {Alper Cakan and Dakshita Khurana and Tomoyuki Morimae and Yuki Shirakawa and Kabir Tomer and Takashi Yamakawa},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.05055},
year = {2025}
}