English

On the Confidentiality of Information Dispersal Algorithms and Their Erasure Codes

Information Theory 2015-03-20 v2 Cryptography and Security Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing math.IT

Abstract

\emph{Information Dispersal Algorithms (IDAs)} have been widely applied to reliable and secure storage and transmission of data files in distributed systems. An IDA is a method that encodes a file FF of size L=FL=|F| into nn unrecognizable pieces F1F_1, F2F_2, ..., FnF_n, each of size L/mL/m (m<nm<n), so that the original file FF can be reconstructed from any mm pieces. The core of an IDA is the adopted non-systematic mm-of-nn erasure code. This paper makes a systematic study on the \emph{confidentiality} of an IDA and its connection with the adopted erasure code. Two levels of confidentiality are defined: \emph{weak confidentiality} (in the case where some parts of the original file FF can be reconstructed explicitly from fewer than mm pieces) and \emph{strong confidentiality} (in the case where nothing of the original file FF can be reconstructed explicitly from fewer than mm pieces). For an IDA that adopts an arbitrary non-systematic erasure code, its confidentiality may fall into weak confidentiality. To achieve strong confidentiality, this paper explores a sufficient and feasible condition on the adopted erasure code. Then, this paper shows that Rabin's IDA has strong confidentiality. At the same time, this paper presents an effective way to construct an IDA with strong confidentiality from an arbitrary mm-of-(m+n)(m+n) erasure code. Then, as an example, this paper constructs an IDA with strong confidentiality from a Reed-Solomon code, the computation complexity of which is comparable to or sometimes even lower than that of Rabin's IDA.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1206.4123,
  title  = {On the Confidentiality of Information Dispersal Algorithms and Their Erasure Codes},
  author = {Mingqiang Li},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.4123},
  year   = {2015}
}

Comments

This version includes a correction on the example in Section IV