English

On the arithmetic complexity of computing Gr\"obner bases of comaximal determinantal ideals

Symbolic Computation 2024-05-03 v2 Commutative Algebra

Abstract

Let MM be an n×nn\times n matrix of homogeneous linear forms over a field k\Bbbk. If the ideal In2(M)\mathcal{I}_{n-2}(M) generated by minors of size n1n-1 is Cohen-Macaulay, then the Gulliksen-Neg{\aa}rd complex is a free resolution of In2(M)\mathcal{I}_{n-2}(M). It has recently been shown that by taking into account the syzygy modules for In2(M)\mathcal{I}_{n-2}(M) which can be obtained from this complex, one can derive a refined signature-based Gr\"obner basis algorithm DetGB which avoids reductions to zero when computing a grevlex Gr\"obner basis for In2(M)\mathcal{I}_{n-2}(M). In this paper, we establish sharp complexity bounds on DetGB. To accomplish this, we prove several results on the sizes of reduced grevlex Gr\"obner bases of reverse lexicographic ideals, thanks to which we obtain two main complexity results which rely on conjectures similar to that of Fr\"oberg. The first one states that, in the zero-dimensional case, the size of the reduced grevlex Gr\"obner basis of In2(M)\mathcal{I}_{n-2}(M) is bounded from below by n6n^{6} asymptotically. The second, also in the zero-dimensional case, states that the complexity of DetGB is bounded from above by n2ω+3n^{2\omega+3} asymptotically, where 2ω32\le\omega\le 3 is any complexity exponent for matrix multiplication over k\Bbbk.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2403.02160,
  title  = {On the arithmetic complexity of computing Gr\"obner bases of comaximal determinantal ideals},
  author = {Sriram Gopalakrishnan},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.02160},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

26 pages, 2 algorithms; updated remarks after Theorem 6.5