English

On Stress-Strain Responses and Young's Moduli of Single Alkane Molecules, A Molecular Mechanics Study Using the Modified Embedded-Atom Method

Materials Science 2016-05-09 v1

Abstract

In this work, molecular mechanics simulations were performed using a modified embedded-atom method (MEAM) potential to generate the stress-strain responses of a series of n-alkane molecules from ethane (C2_2H6_6) to undecane (n-C11_{11}H24_{24}) in tensile deformation up to the point of bond rupture. The results are further generalized to a single polyethylene (PE) chain. Force, true Cauchy stress, true virial stress, and Young's moduli were calculated as a function of true strain for all of the molecules. In calculating the stress of a single molecule, three methods (designated in this work as M1, M2, and M3) are suggested based on three different metrics to quantify both the instantaneous molecular cross-sectional area and volume during deformation. The predictions of these methods are compared to theoretical, first-principles, and experimental data. M1 gives true Cauchy and true virial stress results that are essentially equivalent, suggesting that it is a better method for calculating stress in alkane molecules and, hence, PE single chain. The MEAM predictions of the average elastic modulus for a single PE chain using M1, M2, and M3 are 401 GPa, 172 GPa, and 147 GPa, respectively. Though these results are disparate, M1 gives a modulus value that is strikingly close to the ab initio-calculated value of 405 GPa for the -CH2_2CH2_2- repeat unit of PE at 0 K. To further test the MEAM potential, the Young's modulus (C33_{33} elastic constant) of an orthorhombic PE crystal cell was calculated, but its value (184 GPa) underestimates the DFT-calculated value of 316 GPa by 42%.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1605.01896,
  title  = {On Stress-Strain Responses and Young's Moduli of Single Alkane Molecules, A Molecular Mechanics Study Using the Modified Embedded-Atom Method},
  author = {Sasan Nouranian and Steven R. Gwaltney and Michael I. Baskes and Mark A. Tschopp and Mark F. Horstemeyer},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.01896},
  year   = {2016}
}

Comments

11 pages, 4 figures, 2 tables