English

On Shilov boundaries, Rees valuations and integral extensions

Commutative Algebra 2025-11-04 v2 Algebraic Geometry Number Theory

Abstract

We explore an analogy between, on one hand, the notions of integral closure of ideals and Rees valuations in commutative algebra and, on the other hand, the notions of spectral seminorm and Shilov boundary in nonarchimedean geometry. For any Tate ring A\mathcal{A} with a Noetherian ring of definition A0\mathcal{A}_{0} and pseudo-uniformizer ϖA0\varpi\in\mathcal{A}_{0}, we prove that the Shilov boundary for A\mathcal{A} naturally coincides with the set of Rees valuation rings of the principal ideal (ϖ)A0(\varpi)_{\mathcal{A}_{0}} of A0\mathcal{A}_{0}. Furthermore, we characterize the Shilov boundary for a wide class of Tate rings by means of minimal open prime ideals in the subring of power-bounded elements. For affinoid algebras, in the sense of Tate, whose underlying rings are integral domains, this recovers a well-known result of Berkovich. Moreover, under some mild assumptions, we prove stability of our characterization of the Shilov boundary under (completed) integral extensions. In particular, for every mixed-characteristic Noetherian domain RR, we obtain a description of the Shilov boundary for the Tate ring R+^[p1]\widehat{R^{+}}[p^{-1}], where R+^\widehat{R^{+}} is the pp-adic completion of the absolute integral closure of the domain RR.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2507.07091,
  title  = {On Shilov boundaries, Rees valuations and integral extensions},
  author = {Dimitri Dine},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.07091},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

78 pages. Corrected a mistake in Lemma 6.17 of the previous version and in Section 8

R2 v1 2026-07-01T03:53:37.840Z