English

On parametric Thue-Morse Sequences and Lacunary Trigonometric Products

Number Theory 2015-02-26 v2 Classical Analysis and ODEs

Abstract

One of the fundamental theorems of uniform distribution theory states that the fractional parts of the sequence (nα)n1(n \alpha)_{n \geq 1} are uniformly distributed modulo one (u.d. mod 1) for every irrational number α\alpha. Another important result of Weyl states that for every sequence (nk)k1(n_k)_{k \geq 1} of distinct positive integers the sequence of fractional parts of (nkα)k1(n_k \alpha)_{k \geq 1} is u.d. mod 1 for almost all α\alpha. However, in this general case it is usually extremely difficult to classify those α\alpha for which uniform distribution occurs, and to measure the speed of convergence of the empirical distribution of ({n1α},...,{nNα})(\{n_1 \alpha\}, ..., \{n_N \alpha\}) towards the uniform distribution. In the present paper we investigate this problem in the case when (nk)k1(n_k)_{k \geq 1} is the Thue--Morse sequence of integers, which means the sequence of positive integers having an even sum of digits in base 2. In particular we utilize a connection with lacunary trigonometric products =0Lsinπ2α\prod^{L}_{\ell=0} |\sin \pi 2^{\ell} \alpha |, and by giving sharp metric estimates for such products we derive sharp metric estimates for exponential sums of (nkα)k1(n_{k} \alpha)_{k \geq 1} and for the discrepancy of ({nkα})k1.(\{n_{k} \alpha\})_{k \geq 1}. Furthermore, we comment on the connection between our results and an open problem in the metric theory of Diophantine approximation, and we provide some explicit examples of numbers α\alpha for which we can give estimates for the discrepancy of ({nkα})k1(\{n_{k} \alpha\})_{k \geq1}.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1502.06738,
  title  = {On parametric Thue-Morse Sequences and Lacunary Trigonometric Products},
  author = {Christoph Aistleitner and Roswitha Hofer and Gerhard Larcher},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.06738},
  year   = {2015}
}

Comments

46 pages. Version 2: fixed typo in statement of Theorem 2