English

On lower bounds for the distances between APN functions

Combinatorics 2026-01-26 v2

Abstract

Whether two distinct APN functions can have a Hamming distance of 11 remains an open problem. In 2020, L. Budaghyan et al. introduced a new CCZ-invariant ΠF\Pi_F which can be used to provide lower bounds on the Hamming distance between a given APN function F ⁣:F2nF2nF \colon \mathbb{F}_2^n \to \mathbb{F}_2^n and other APN functions. Lower bounds on the distance from an APN function FF to any other are known for almost bent (AB) functions and when FF is a 3-to-1 quadratic function with nn even. In this paper, we reinterpret ΠF\Pi_F in terms of the exclude multiplicities of the graph GF={(x,F(x)):xF2n}\mathcal{G}_F=\{(x, F(x)) : x \in \mathbb{F}_2^n\} of FF as a Sidon set. We establish lower bounds on the distance for even nn when FF is plateaued APN, generalize the known lower bounds for quadratic 33-to-11 function to all 3-to-1 plateaued functions (e.g. Kasami functions), and derive new lower bounds for when FF is the APN inverse function over F2n\mathbb{F}_{2^n} for nn odd. We also study how the exclude multiplicities of GF\mathcal{G}_F are directly connected to the existence of linear structures of γF\gamma_F when FF is plateaued and APN and the ortho-derivative when FF is a quadratic APN function. We also use the CCZ-invariance of exclude multiplicities to prove that the Brinkmann-Leander-Edel-Pott function is not CCZ-equivalent to a plateaued function.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2509.02280,
  title  = {On lower bounds for the distances between APN functions},
  author = {Maria Mihaila and Darrion Thornburgh},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.02280},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

29 pages

R2 v1 2026-07-01T05:17:16.609Z