On generalized hexagons of order $(3, t)$ and $(4, t)$ containing a subhexagon
Combinatorics
2016-12-13 v2
Abstract
We prove that there are no semi-finite generalized hexagons with points on each line containing the known generalized hexagons of order as full subgeometries when is equal to or , thus contributing to the existence problem of semi-finite generalized polygons posed by Tits. The case when is equal to was treated by us in an earlier work, for which we give an alternate proof. For the split Cayley hexagon of order we obtain the stronger result that it cannot be contained as a proper full subgeometry in any generalized hexagon.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.1607.01004,
title = {On generalized hexagons of order $(3, t)$ and $(4, t)$ containing a subhexagon},
author = {Anurag Bishnoi and Bart De Bruyn},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.01004},
year = {2016}
}
Comments
13 pages, minor revisions based on referee reports, to appear in European Journal of Combinatorics