English

On Coxeter Diagrams of complex reflection groups

Group Theory 2010-12-07 v2 Representation Theory

Abstract

We study Coxeter diagrams of some unitary reflection groups. Using solely the combinatorics of diagrams, we give a new proof of the classification of root lattices defined over \cE=\ZZ[e2πi/3]\cE = \ZZ[e^{2 \pi i/3}]: there are only four such lattices, namely, the \cE\cE-lattices whose real forms are A2A_2, D4D_4, E6E_6 and E8E_8. Next, we address the issue of characterizing the diagrams for unitary reflection groups, a question that was raised by Brou\'{e}, Malle and Rouquier. To this end, we describe an algorithm which, given a unitary reflection group GG, picks out a set of complex reflections. The algorithm is based on an analogy with Weyl groups. If GG is a Weyl group, the algorithm immediately yields a set of simple roots. Experimentally we observe that if GG is primitive and GG has a set of roots whose \ZZ\ZZ--span is a discrete subset of the ambient vector space, then the algorithm selects a minimal generating set for GG. The group GG has a presentation on these generators such that if we forget that the generators have finite order then we get a (Coxeter-like) presentation of the corresponding braid group. For some groups, such as G33G_{33} and G34G_{34}, new diagrams are obtained. For G34G_{34}, our new diagram extends to an "affine diagram" with \ZZ/7\ZZ\ZZ/7\ZZ symmetry.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.0809.2427,
  title  = {On Coxeter Diagrams of complex reflection groups},
  author = {Tathagata Basak},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0809.2427},
  year   = {2010}
}

Comments

27 pages, 4 figures. Major addition to the previous version. Section 4 is new. Organization of the paper modified. Stylistic changes. Small errors and typos corrected

R2 v1 2026-06-21T11:20:08.236Z