English

On biharmonic submanifolds in non-positively curved manifolds

Differential Geometry 2014-05-30 v4

Abstract

In the biharmonic submanifolds theory there is a generalized Chen's conjecture which states that biharmonic submanifolds in a Riemannian manifold with non-positive sectional curvature must be minimal. This conjecture turned out false by a counter example of Y. L. Ou and L. Tang in \cite{Ou-Ta}. However it remains interesting to find out sufficient conditions which guarantee this conjecture to be true. In this note we prove that: 1. Any complete biharmonic submanifold (resp. hypersurface) (M,g)(M, g) in a Riemannian manifold (N,h)(N, h) with non-positive sectional curvature (resp. Ricci curvature) which satisfies an integral condition: for some p(0,+)p\in (0, +\infty), MHpdug<+,\int_{M}|\vec{H}|^{p}du_g<+\infty, where H\vec{H} is the mean curvature vector field of MNM\hookrightarrow N, must be minimal. This generalizes the recent results due to N. Nakauchi and H. Urakawa in \cite{Na-Ur1} and \cite{Na-Ur2}. 2. Any complete biharmonic submanifold (resp. hypersurface) in a Reimannian manifold of at most polynomial volume growth whose sectional curvature (resp. Ricci curvature) is non-positive must be minimal. 3. Any complete biharmonic submanifold (resp. hypersurface) in a non-positively curved manifold whose sectional curvature (resp. Ricci curvature) is smaller that ϵ-\epsilon for some ϵ>0\epsilon>0 which satisfies that Bρ(x0)Hp+2dμg(p0)\int_{B_\rho(x_0)}|\vec{H}|^{p+2}d\mu_g(p\geq0) is of at most polynomial growth of ρ\rho, must be minimal. We also consider ε\varepsilon-superbiharmonic submanifolds defined recently in \cite{Wh} by G. Wheeler and prove similar results for ε\varepsilon-superbiharmonic submanifolds, which generalize the result in \cite{Wh}.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1306.6069,
  title  = {On biharmonic submanifolds in non-positively curved manifolds},
  author = {Yong Luo},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.6069},
  year   = {2014}
}

Comments

16 pages, Errors in Theorem 1.7 corrected. All comments are welcome!