On Approximately Strategy-Proof Tournament Rules for Collusions of Size at Least Three
Abstract
A tournament organizer must select one of possible teams as the winner of a competition after observing all matches between them. The organizer would like to find a tournament rule that simultaneously satisfies the following desiderata. It must be Condorcet-consistent (henceforth, CC), meaning it selects as the winner the unique team that beats all other teams (if one exists). It must also be strongly non-manipulable for groups of size at probability (henceforth, k-SNM-), meaning that no subset of teams can fix the matches among themselves in order to increase the chances any of it's members being selected by more than . Our contributions are threefold. First, wee consider a natural generalization of the Randomized Single Elimination Bracket rule from [Schneider et al. 2017] to -ary trees and provide upper bounds to its manipulability. Then, we propose a novel tournament rule that is CC and 3-SNM-1/2, a strict improvement upon the concurrent work of [Dinev and Weinberg, 2022] who proposed a CC and 3-SNM-31/60 rule. Finally, we initiate the study of reductions among tournament rules.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2407.17569,
title = {On Approximately Strategy-Proof Tournament Rules for Collusions of Size at Least Three},
author = {David Mikšaník and Ariel Schvartzman and Jan Soukup},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.17569},
year = {2024}
}