English

On a Possible Solution to the Tidal Realignment Problem for Hot Jupiters

Earth and Planetary Astrophysics 2021-06-23 v2 Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

Abstract

Hot stars with hot Jupiters have a wide range of obliquities, while cool stars with hot Jupiters tend to have low obliquities. An enticing explanation for this pattern is tidal realignment of the cool host stars, although this explanation assumes that obliquity damping occurs faster than orbital decay, an assumption that needs further exploration. Here we revisit this tidal realignment problem, building on previous work identifying a low-frequency component of the time-variable tidal potential that affects the obliquity but not the orbital separation. We adopt a recent empirically-based model for the stellar tidal quality factor and its sharp increase with forcing frequency. This leads to enhanced dissipation at low frequencies, and efficient obliquity damping. We model the tidal evolution of 46 observed hot Jupiters orbiting cool stars. A key parameter is the stellar age, which we determine in a homogeneous manner for the sample, taking advantage of Gaia DR2 data. We explore a variety of tidal histories and futures for each system, finding in most cases that the stellar obliquity is successfully damped before the planet is destroyed. A testable prediction of our model is that hot-Jupiter hosts with orbital periods shorter than 2--3 days should have obliquities much smaller than 11^\circ. With the possible exception of WASP-19b, the predicted future lifetimes of the planets range from 10810^8\,yr to more than 101010^{10}\,yr. Thus, our model implies that these hot Jupiters are probably not in immediate danger of being devoured by their host stars while they are on the main sequence.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2102.01081,
  title  = {On a Possible Solution to the Tidal Realignment Problem for Hot Jupiters},
  author = {Kassandra R. Anderson and Joshua N. Winn and Kaloyan Penev},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.01081},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

24 pages, 14 figures, 1 table, accepted for publication in ApJ. Revised version following the referee report

R2 v1 2026-06-23T22:44:17.191Z