OMGs: A multi-agent system supporting MDT decision-making across the ovarian tumour care continuum
Abstract
Ovarian tumour management has increasingly relied on multidisciplinary tumour board (MDT) deliberation to address treatment complexity and disease heterogeneity. However, most patients worldwide lack access to timely expert consensus, particularly in resource-constrained centres where MDT resources are scarce or unavailable. Here we present OMGs (Ovarian tumour Multidisciplinary intelligent aGent System), a multi-agent AI framework where domain-specific agents deliberate collaboratively to integrate multidisciplinary evidence and generate MDT-style recommendations with transparent rationales. To systematically evaluate MDT recommendation quality, we developed SPEAR (Safety, Personalization, Evidence, Actionability, Robustness) and validated OMGs across diverse clinical scenarios spanning the care continuum. In multicentre re-evaluation, OMGs achieved performance comparable to expert MDT consensus ( versus ), with higher Evidence scores (4.57 versus 3.92). In prospective multicentre evaluation (59 patients), OMGs demonstrated high concordance with routine MDT decisions. Critically, in paired human-AI studies, OMGs most substantially enhanced clinicians' recommendations in Evidence and Robustness, the dimensions most compromised when multidisciplinary expertise is unavailable. These findings suggest that multi-agent deliberative systems can achieve performance comparable to expert MDT consensus, with potential to expand access to specialized oncology expertise in resource-limited settings.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2602.13793,
title = {OMGs: A multi-agent system supporting MDT decision-making across the ovarian tumour care continuum},
author = {Yangyang Zhang and Zilong Wang and Jianbo Xu and Yongqi Chen and Chu Han and Zhihao Zhang and Shuai Liu and Hui Li and Huiping Zhang and Ziqi Liu and Jiaxin Chen and Jun Zhu and Zheng Feng and Hao Wen and Xingzhu Ju and Yanping Zhong and Yunqiu Zhang and Jie Duan and Jun Li and Dongsheng Li and Weijie Wang and Haiyan Zhu and Wei Jiang and Xiaohua Wu and Shuo Wang and Haiming Li and Qinhao Guo},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.13793},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
27 pages, 5 figures, 1 table