English

Oligarchic growth of giant planets

Astrophysics 2009-11-07 v1

Abstract

Runaway growth ends when the largest protoplanets dominate the dynamics of the planetesimal disk; the subsequent self-limiting accretion mode is referred to as ``oligarchic growth.'' Here, we begin by expanding on the existing analytic model of the oligarchic growth regime. From this, we derive global estimates of the planet formation rate throughout a protoplanetary disk. We find that a relatively high-mass protoplanetary disk (\sim 10×\times minimum-mass) is required to produce giant planet core-sized bodies (\sim 10 M_{\oplus}) within the lifetime of the nebular gas (\la\la 10 million years). However, an implausibly massive disk is needed to produce even an Earth mass at the orbit of Uranus by 10 Myrs. Subsequent accretion without the dissipational effect of gas is even slower and less efficient. In the limit of non-interacting planetesimals, a reasonable-mass disk is unable to produce bodies the size of the Solar System's two outer giant planets at their current locations on {\it any} timescale; if collisional damping of planetesimal random velocities is sufficiently effective, though, it may be possible for a Uranus/Neptune to form in situ in less than the age of the Solar System. We perform numerical simulations of oligarchic growth with gas, and find that protoplanet growth rates agree reasonably well with the analytic model as long as protoplanet masses are well below their estimated final masses. However, accretion stalls earlier than predicted, so that the largest final protoplanet masses are smaller than those given by the model. Thus the oligarchic growth model, in the form developed here, appears to provide an upper limit for the efficiency of giant planet formation.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.astro-ph/0303269,
  title  = {Oligarchic growth of giant planets},
  author = {Edward W. Thommes and Martin J. Duncan and Harold F. Levison},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:astro-ph/0303269},
  year   = {2009}
}

Comments

ScienceDirect already has the final published version here: dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-1035(02)00043-X