English

Nucleosynthesis Constraints on the Energy Growth Timescale of a Core-collapse Supernova Explosion

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena 2019-12-30 v2 Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

Abstract

Details of the explosion mechanism of core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) are not yet fully understood. There is an increasing number of numerical examples by ab-initio core-collapse simulations leading to an explosion. Most, if not all, of the ab-initio core-collapse simulations represent a `slow' explosion in which the observed explosion energy (1051\sim 10^{51} ergs) is reached in a timescale of 1\gtrsim1 second. It is, however, unclear whether such a slow explosion is consistent with observations. In this work, by performing nuclear reaction network calculations for a range of the explosion timescale tgrowt_{\rm grow}, from the rapid to slow models, we aim at providing nucleosynthetic diagnostics on the explosion timescale. We employ one-dimensional hydrodynamic and nucleosynthesis simulations above the proto-neutron star core, by parameterizing the nature of the explosion mechanism by tgrowt_{\rm grow}. The results are then compared to various observational constraints; the masses of 56^{56}Ni derived for typical CCSNe, the masses of 57^{57}Ni and 44^{44}Ti observed for SN 1987A, and the abundance patterns observed in extremely metal-poor stars. We find that these observational constraints are consistent with the `rapid' explosion (tgrow250t_{\rm grow} \lesssim 250 ms), and especially the best match is found for a nearly instantaneous explosion (tgrow50t_{\rm grow} \lesssim 50 ms). Our finding places a strong constraint on the explosion mechanism; the slow mechanism (tgrow1000t_{\rm grow} \gtrsim 1000 ms) would not satisfy these constraints, and the ab-inito simulations will need to realize a rapid explosion.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1910.06972,
  title  = {Nucleosynthesis Constraints on the Energy Growth Timescale of a Core-collapse Supernova Explosion},
  author = {Ryo Sawada and Keiichi Maeda},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.06972},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

18 pages, 14 figures, 1 table, accepted for publication in ApJ