English

Nucleon Isovector Axial Form Factors

High Energy Physics - Lattice 2024-06-14 v3 Nuclear Theory

Abstract

We present results for the isovector axial vector form factors obtained using thirteen 2+1+1-flavor highly improved staggered quark (HISQ) ensembles generated by the MILC collaboration. The calculation of nucleon two- and three-point correlation functions has been done using Wilson-clover fermions. In the analysis of these data, we quantify the sensitivity of the results to strategies used for removing excited state contamination and invoke the partially conserved axial current relation between the form factors to choose between them. Our data driven analysis includes removing contributions from multihadron NπN \pi states that make significant contributions. Our final results are: gA=1.292(53)stat(24)sysg_A = 1.292 (53)_\text{stat}\,(24)_\text{sys} for the axial charge; gS=1.085(50)stat(103)sysg_S = 1.085 (50)_\text{stat}\, (103)_\text{sys} and gT=0.991(21)stat(10)sysg_T = 0.991 (21)_\text{stat}\, (10)_\text{sys} for the scalar and tensor charges; rA2=0.439(56)stat(34)sys\langle r_A^2 \rangle = 0.439 (56)_\text{stat} (34)_\text{sys} fm2{}^2 for the mean squared axial charge radius, gP=9.03(47)stat(42)sysg_P^\ast = 9.03(47)_\text{stat}(42)_\text{sys} for the induced pseudoscalar charge; and gπNN=14.14(81)stat(85)sysg_{\pi NN} = 14.14(81)_\text{stat}(85)_\text{sys} for the pion-nucleon coupling. We also provide a parameterization of the axial form factor GA(Q2)G_A(Q^2) over the range 0Q210 \le Q^2 \le 1 GeV2{}^2 for use in phenomenology and a comparison with other lattice determinations. We find that the various lattice data agree within 10\% but are significantly different from the extraction of GA(Q2)G_A(Q^2) from the ν\nu-deuterium scattering data.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2305.11330,
  title  = {Nucleon Isovector Axial Form Factors},
  author = {Yong-Chull Jang and Rajan Gupta and Tanmoy Bhattacharya and Boram Yoon and Huey-Wen Lin},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11330},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

49 pages, 24 figures, 35 tables. Final version published in PRD