English

Note on the Gauge Fixing in Gauge Theory

High Energy Physics - Theory 2009-10-31 v1 High Energy Physics - Lattice High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Abstract

In the absence of Gribov complications, the modified gauge fixing in gauge theory DAμ{exp[SYM(Aμ)f(Aμ)dx]/Dgexp[f(Aμg)dx]} \int{\cal D}A_{\mu}\{\exp[-S_{YM}(A_{\mu})-\int f(A_{\mu})dx] /\int{\cal D}g\exp[-\int f(A_{\mu}^{g})dx]\} for example, f(Aμ)=(1/2)(Aμ)2f(A_{\mu})=(1/2)(A_{\mu})^{2}, is identical to the conventional Faddeev-Popov formula DAμ{δ(Dμδf(Aν)δAμ)/Dgδ(Dμδf(Aνg)δAμg)}exp[SYM(Aμ)]\int{\cal D}A_{\mu}\{\delta(D^{\mu}\frac{\delta f(A_{\nu})}{\delta A_{\mu}})/\int {\cal D}g\delta(D^{\mu}\frac{\delta f(A_{\nu}^{g})} {\delta A_{\mu}^{g}})\}\exp[-S_{YM}(A_{\mu})] if one takes into account the variation of the gauge field along the entire gauge orbit. Despite of its quite different appearance,the modified formula defines a local and BRST invariant theory and thus ensures unitarity at least in perturbation theory. In the presence of Gribov complications, as is expected in non-perturbative Yang-Mills theory, the modified formula is equivalent to the conventional formula but not identical to it:Both of the definitions give rise to non-local theory in general and thus the unitarity is not obvious. Implications of the present analysis on the lattice regularization are briefly discussed.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.hep-th/9912253,
  title  = {Note on the Gauge Fixing in Gauge Theory},
  author = {Kazuo Fujikawa and Hiroaki Terashima},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:hep-th/9912253},
  year   = {2009}
}

Comments

12 pages