English

Noncommutative Manifolds the Instanton Algebra and Isospectral Deformations

Quantum Algebra 2011-07-19 v3 High Energy Physics - Theory Algebraic Geometry Operator Algebras

Abstract

We give new examples of noncommutative manifolds that are less standard than the NC-torus or Moyal deformations of \Rbn\Rb^n. They arise naturally from basic considerations of noncommutative differential topology and have non-trivial global features. The new examples include the instanton algebra and the NC-4-spheres Sθ4S^4_{\theta}. The noncommutative algebras \Ac=C\ify(Sθ4)\Ac=C^{\ify} (S^{4}_{\theta}) of functions on NC-spheres are solutions to the vanishing, chj(e)=0,j<2 {\rm ch}_j (e) = 0, j < 2 , of the Chern character in the cyclic homology of \Ac\Ac of an idempotent eM4(\Ac),e2=e,e=ee \in M_4 (\Ac), e^2 = e, e = e^*. The universal noncommutative space defined by this equation is a noncommutative Grassmanian defined by very non trivial cubic relations. This space Gr{\rm Gr} contains the suspension of a NC-3-sphere intimately related to quantum group deformations SUq(2){\rm SU}_q (2) of SU(2){\rm SU} (2) but for unusual values (complex values of modulus one) of the parameter qq of qq-analogues, q=exp(2πi\t)q=\exp (2\pi i \t). We then construct the noncommutative geometry of S\t4S_{\t}^4 as given by a spectral triple (\Ac,\Hc,D)(\Ac, \Hc, D) and check all axioms of noncommutative manifolds. The Dirac operator DD on the noncommutative 4-spheres S\t4S_{\t}^4 gives a solution to the basic quartic equation defining the `volume form' <(e1/2)[D,e]4>=\g5 < (e - {1/2}) [D,e]^4 > = \g_5, where << is the projection on the commutant of 4\ts44 \ts 4 matrices. Finally, we show that any compact Riemannian spin manifold whose isometry group has rank r2r \geq 2 admits isospectral deformations to noncommutative geometries.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.math/0011194,
  title  = {Noncommutative Manifolds the Instanton Algebra and Isospectral Deformations},
  author = {Alain Connes and Giovanni Landi},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:math/0011194},
  year   = {2011}
}

Comments

We introduce the notion of admissible morphism and use it to clarify a confusing point. Definite version to appear in CMP. 20 pages, latex

R2 v1 2026-07-22T16:35:56.182Z