English

Non-renormalizable terms and M theory during inflation

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2009-10-30 v2 Astrophysics High Energy Physics - Theory

Abstract

Inflation is well known to be difficult in the context of supergravity, if the potential is dominated by the FF term. Non-renormalizable terms generically give VV/M2|V''|\sim V/M^2, where V(ϕ)V(\phi) is the inflaton potential and MM is the scale above which the effective field theory under consideration is supposed to break down. This is equivalent to η(\mpl/M)2>1|\eta|\sim (\mpl/M)^2 > 1 where \mpl=(8πG)1/2\mpl=(8\pi G)^{-1/2}, but inflation requires η<0.1|\eta|<0.1 . I here point out that all of the above applies also if the DD term dominates, with the crucial difference that the generic result is now easily avoided by imposing a discrete symmetry. I also point out that if extra spacetime dimensions appear well below the Planck scale, as in a recent M-theory model, one expects M\mplM\ll \mpl, which makes the problem worse than if M\mplM\sim \mpl.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.hep-ph/9710347,
  title  = {Non-renormalizable terms and M theory during inflation},
  author = {David Lyth},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:hep-ph/9710347},
  year   = {2009}
}

Comments

9 pages latex. Significant change flagged by 3rd footnote

R2 v1 2026-07-22T14:39:55.589Z