Non-renormalizable terms and M theory during inflation
Abstract
Inflation is well known to be difficult in the context of supergravity, if the potential is dominated by the term. Non-renormalizable terms generically give , where is the inflaton potential and is the scale above which the effective field theory under consideration is supposed to break down. This is equivalent to where , but inflation requires . I here point out that all of the above applies also if the term dominates, with the crucial difference that the generic result is now easily avoided by imposing a discrete symmetry. I also point out that if extra spacetime dimensions appear well below the Planck scale, as in a recent M-theory model, one expects , which makes the problem worse than if .
Cite
@article{arxiv.hep-ph/9710347,
title = {Non-renormalizable terms and M theory during inflation},
author = {David Lyth},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:hep-ph/9710347},
year = {2009}
}
Comments
9 pages latex. Significant change flagged by 3rd footnote