English

Non-Gaussian statistics of de Sitter spectators: A perturbative derivation of stochastic dynamics

High Energy Physics - Theory 2025-12-30 v3 Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

Abstract

Scalar fields interacting with the primordial curvature perturbation during inflation may communicate their statistics to the latter. This situation motivates the study of how the probability density function (PDF) of a light spectator field φ\varphi in a pure de Sitter space-time, becomes non-Gaussian under the influence of a scalar potential V(φ){\mathcal V(\varphi)}. One approach to this problem is offered by the stochastic formalism introduced by Starobinsky and Yokoyama. It results in a Fokker-Planck equation for the time-dependent PDF ρ(φ,t)\rho (\varphi , t) describing the statistics of φ\varphi which, in the limit of equilibrium gives one back the solution ρ(φ)exp[8π23H4V(φ)]\rho (\varphi) \propto \exp \big[ - \frac{8 \pi^2}{3 H^4} {\mathcal V(\varphi)} \big]. We study the derivation of ρ(φ,t)\rho (\varphi , t) using quantum field theory tools. Our approach yields an almost Gaussian distribution function, distorted by minor corrections comprised of terms proportional to powers of OφV(φ)\mathcal O_\varphi {\mathcal V(\varphi)}, where Oφ\mathcal O_\varphi stands for a derivative operator acting on V(φ){\mathcal V(\varphi)} proportional to ΔN\Delta N, the number of ee-folds succeeding the Hubble-horizon crossing of φ\varphi's wavelengths. This general form is obtained perturbatively and remains valid even with loop corrections. Our solution satisfies a Fokker-Planck equation that receives corrections with respect to the one found within the stochastic approach, allowing us to comment on the validity of the standard equilibrium solution for generic potentials. We posit that higher order corrections to the Fokker-Planck equation may become important towards the equilibrium.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2309.16474,
  title  = {Non-Gaussian statistics of de Sitter spectators: A perturbative derivation of stochastic dynamics},
  author = {Gonzalo A. Palma and Spyros Sypsas},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16474},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

V1: 53 pp. plus references; V2: Rewrote Sec.6, which is now much clearer. Improved notation throughout. Added clarifications and references. 49 pp. + refs; V3: corrected typo in eq.(6.27) (spotted by the referee) which was obstructing the proper derivation of eq.(8.7). Also corrected eqs.(4.9) and (4.10) and added a few technical clarifications