English

Non-adiabatic phonon renormalization in metallic versus insulating rutile oxides

Materials Science 2026-05-25 v1

Abstract

We present a comparative Raman scattering study of metallic rutile oxides (RuO2_2 and IrO2_2) and insulating rutiles (TiO2_2 and SnO2_2). Temperature-dependent Raman spectra reveal that the metallic compounds exhibit pronounced phonon frequency hardening, ω(11 K)ω(300 K)=Δω6\omega(11~\mathrm{K})-\omega(300~\mathrm{K})=\Delta\omega \approx 6-10 cm110~\mathrm{cm}^{-1}, whereas the insulating rutiles show only modest hardening, Δω1\Delta\omega \approx 1-3 cm13~\mathrm{cm}^{-1}. In contrast, the linewidth changes, ΔΓ1\Delta\Gamma \approx 1--7 cm17~\mathrm{cm}^{-1}, do not display a systematic metallic-insulating classification. Fits with the conventional Klemens anharmonic decay model reproduce the overall temperature trends but yield inconsistent anharmonic parameters for the metallic compounds when benchmarked against insulating rutile analogues. A modified Klemens framework, incorporating an additional T2T^{2} correction to the phonon frequency arising from the electronic contribution to the phonon self-energy, quantitatively accounts for the enhanced renormalization observed in metallic systems. These results establish finite non-adiabatic electron-phonon coupling in metallic rutiles and demonstrate that phonon renormalization can be identified even in the absence of observable Fano asymmetry in the phonon line shapes.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2605.23227,
  title  = {Non-adiabatic phonon renormalization in metallic versus insulating rutile oxides},
  author = {Reshma Kumawat and Shubham Farswan and Simranjeet Kaur and Kaushik Sen},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.23227},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

Accepted in Phys. Rev. B as a regular article (https://doi.org/10.1103/4nhr-dvbn)