No-$(k+1)$-in-line problem for $k \geqslant 3$
Abstract
What is the maximum number of points one can place in an grid such that every Euclidean line contains at most points? For , this is the notorious no-three-in-line problem of Dudeney. In this paper, we resolve this problem for all other (and sufficiently large ). Namely, for and sufficiently large , we show that this maximum is exactly . To prove this, our key observation is that in the regime , the problem is dominated in a certain statistical sense by the influence of a small number of "heavy" lines with many grid points. We apply a result of Ehard-Glock-Joos on pseudorandom hypergraph matchings to construct a set of size with at most points on each heavy line, and then a crude deletion argument yields a no--in-line set of nearly the same size. Finally, we use a randomised switching procedure to complete the construction (building upon ideas of Simkin and Luria). Using similar ideas, we also address the no-four-on-a-circle problem of Erd\H{o}s and Purdy. Namely, we prove the existence of a set of points in the grid such that no four of these points lie on a circle or a line, improving on the previous construction of size due to Dong and Xu.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2607.05255,
title = {No-$(k+1)$-in-line problem for $k \geqslant 3$},
author = {Anubhab Ghosal and Ritesh Goenka and Alexandr Grebennikov and Peter Keevash and Matthew Kwan and Huy Tuan Pham},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.05255},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
20 pages + 3 page appendix