The accessibility surge and abuse risks of user-friendly image editing models have created an urgent need for generalizable, up-to-date methods for Image Manipulation Detection and Localization (IMDL). Current IMDL research typically uses cross-dataset evaluation, where models trained on one benchmark are tested on others. However, this simplified evaluation approach conceals the fragility of existing methods when handling diverse AI-generated content, leading to misleading impressions of progress. This paper challenges this illusion by proposing NeXT-IMDL, a large-scale diagnostic benchmark designed not just to collect data, but to probe the generalization boundaries of current detectors systematically. Specifically, NeXT-IMDL categorizes AIGC-based manipulations along four fundamental axes: editing models, manipulation types, content semantics, and forgery granularity. Built upon this, NeXT-IMDL implements five rigorous cross-dimension evaluation protocols. Our extensive experiments on 11 representative models reveal a critical insight: while these models perform well in their original settings, they exhibit systemic failures and significant performance degradation when evaluated under our designed protocols that simulate real-world, various generalization scenarios. By providing this diagnostic toolkit and the new findings, we aim to advance the development towards building truly robust, next-generation IMDL models.
@article{arxiv.2512.23374,
title = {NeXT-IMDL: Build Benchmark for NeXT-Generation Image Manipulation Detection & Localization},
author = {Yifei Li and Haoyuan He and Yu Zheng and Bingyao Yu and Wenzhao Zheng and Lei Chen and Jie Zhou and Jiwen Lu},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.23374},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
Duplicate experiment results in Table 3 (Set-1 & Set-2)