Neutral Bremsstrahlung emission in xenon unveiled
Abstract
We present evidence of non-excimer-based secondary scintillation in gaseous xenon, obtained using both the NEXT-White TPC and a dedicated setup. Detailed comparison with first-principle calculations allows us to assign this scintillation mechanism to neutral bremsstrahlung (NBrS), a process that has been postulated to exist in xenon that has been largely overlooked. For photon emission below 1000 nm, the NBrS yield increases from about 10 photon/e cm bar at pressure-reduced electric field values of 50 V cm bar to above 310 photon/e cm bar at 500 V cm bar. Above 1.5 kV cm bar, values that are typically employed for electroluminescence, it is estimated that NBrS is present with an intensity around 1 photon/e cm bar, which is about two orders of magnitude lower than conventional, excimer-based electroluminescence. Despite being fainter than its excimeric counterpart, our calculations reveal that NBrS causes luminous backgrounds that can interfere, in either gas or liquid phase, with the ability to distinguish and/or to precisely measure low primary-scintillation signals (S1). In particular, we show this to be the case in the "buffer" and "veto" regions, where keeping the electric field below the electroluminescence (EL) threshold will not suffice to extinguish secondary scintillation. The electric field in these regions should be chosen carefully to avoid intolerable levels of NBrS emission. Furthermore, we show that this new source of light emission opens up a viable path towards obtaining S2 signals for discrimination purposes in future single-phase liquid TPCs for neutrino and dark matter physics, with estimated yields up to 20-50 photons/e cm.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2202.02614,
title = {Neutral Bremsstrahlung emission in xenon unveiled},
author = {C. A. O. Henriques and P. Amedo and J. M. R. Teixeira and D. Gonzalez-Diaz and C. D. R. Azevedo and A. Para and J. Martin-Albo and A. Saa Hernandez and J. J. Gomez-Cadenas and D. R. Nygren and C. M. B. Monteiro and C. Adams and V. Alvarez and L. Arazi and I. J. Arnquist and K. Bailey and F. Ballester and J. M. Benlloch-Rodriguez and F. I. G. M. Borges and N. Byrnes and S. Carcel and J. V. Carrion and S. Cebrian and E. Church and C. A. N. Conde and T. Contreras and G. Diaz and J. Diaz and M. Diesburg and J. Escada and R. Esteve and R. Felkai and A. F. M. Fernandes and L. M. P. Fernandes and P. Ferrario and A. L. Ferreira and E. D. C. Freitas and J. Generowicz and S. Ghosh and A. Goldschmidt and R. Guenette and R. M. Gutierrez and J. Haefner and K. Hafidi and J. Hauptman and J. A. Hernando Morata and P. Herrero and V. Herrero and Y. Ifergan and B. J. P. Jones and M. Kekic and L. Labarga and A. Laing and P. Lebrun and N. Lopez-March and M. Losada and R. D. P. Mano and A. Martinez and M. Martinez-Vara and G. Martinez-Lema and A. D. McDonald and F. Monrabal and F. J. Mora and J. Munoz Vidal and P. Novella and B. Palmeiro and J. Perez and M. Querol and A. B. Redwine and J. Renner and J. Repond and S. Riordan and L. Ripoll and Y. Rodriguez Garcia and J. Rodriguez and L. Rogers and B. Romeo and C. Romo-Luque and F. P. Santos and J. M. F. dos Santos and A. Simon and C. Sofka and M. Sorel and T. Stiegler and J. F. Toledo and J. Torrent and A. Uson and J. F. C. A. Veloso and R. Webb and R. Weiss-Babai and J. T. White and K. Woodruff and N. Yahlali},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.02614},
year = {2022}
}
Comments
Published in Physical Review X