English

NeurIPS 2024 ML4CFD Competition: Results and Retrospective Analysis

Machine Learning 2025-06-11 v1

Abstract

The integration of machine learning (ML) into the physical sciences is reshaping computational paradigms, offering the potential to accelerate demanding simulations such as computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Yet, persistent challenges in accuracy, generalization, and physical consistency hinder the practical deployment of ML models in scientific domains. To address these limitations and systematically benchmark progress, we organized the ML4CFD competition, centered on surrogate modeling for aerodynamic simulations over two-dimensional airfoils. The competition attracted over 240 teams, who were provided with a curated dataset generated via OpenFOAM and evaluated through a multi-criteria framework encompassing predictive accuracy, physical fidelity, computational efficiency, and out-of-distribution generalization. This retrospective analysis reviews the competition outcomes, highlighting several approaches that outperformed baselines under our global evaluation score. Notably, the top entry exceeded the performance of the original OpenFOAM solver on aggregate metrics, illustrating the promise of ML-based surrogates to outperform traditional solvers under tailored criteria. Drawing from these results, we analyze the key design principles of top submissions, assess the robustness of our evaluation framework, and offer guidance for future scientific ML challenges.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2506.08516,
  title  = {NeurIPS 2024 ML4CFD Competition: Results and Retrospective Analysis},
  author = {Mouadh Yagoubi and David Danan and Milad Leyli-Abadi and Ahmed Mazari and Jean-Patrick Brunet and Abbas Kabalan and Fabien Casenave and Yuxin Ma and Giovanni Catalani and Jean Fesquet and Jacob Helwig and Xuan Zhang and Haiyang Yu and Xavier Bertrand and Frederic Tost and Michael Baurheim and Joseph Morlier and Shuiwang Ji},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.08516},
  year   = {2025}
}