English

Neighbors, Generic Sets and Scarf-Buchberger Hypersurfaces

Combinatorics 2015-11-30 v1 Commutative Algebra

Abstract

The present paper is motivated by the need to generalize the construction of the Scarf complex in order to give combinatorial resolutions of a much broader class of modules than just the monomial ideals. For any subset ARnA\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n, let N(A)\mathfrak{N}(A) denote the collection of all subsets BAB\subseteq A such that there is no aAa\in A that is strictly less than the supremum of BB in all coordinates. We show that if AZnA\subseteq \mathbb{Z}^n is generic (in a sense appropriate for this context), then N(A)\mathfrak{N}(A) is a locally finite simplicial complex. Moreover, if AA is generic, then the barycentric subdivision of N(A)\mathfrak{N}(A) is equivalent to a triangulation of a PL hypersurface in Rn\mathbb{R}^n. This gives us natural generalizations of the notions of ``staircase surface'' and ``Buchberger graph,'' described by Miller and Sturmfels, to arbitrary dimension. (This seems to be a new result, even in the well-studied case that AA is a finite subset of Nn\mathbb{N}^n.) We give examples that show that when AA is infinite, N(A)\mathfrak{N}(A) may have complicated topology, but if there are at most finitely many elements of AA below any given bRnb\in \mathbb{R}^n, then N(A)\mathfrak{N}(A) is locally contractible. N(A)\mathfrak{N}(A) can therefore be used to construct locally finite free resolutions of sub-k[Nn]k[\mathbb{N}^n]-modules of the group algebra k[Rn]k[\mathbb{R}^n] (kk is a field). We prove various additional facts about the structure of N(A)\mathfrak{N}(A)

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1511.08224,
  title  = {Neighbors, Generic Sets and Scarf-Buchberger Hypersurfaces},
  author = {James J. Madden and Trevor McGuire},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.08224},
  year   = {2015}
}