NARS vs. Reinforcement learning: ONA vs. Q-Learning
Abstract
One of the realistic scenarios is taking a sequence of optimal actions to do a task. Reinforcement learning is the most well-known approach to deal with this kind of task in the machine learning community. Finding a suitable alternative could always be an interesting and out-of-the-box matter. Therefore, in this project, we are looking to investigate the capability of NARS and answer the question of whether NARS has the potential to be a substitute for RL or not. Particularly, we are making a comparison between -Learning and ONA on some environments developed by an Open AI gym. The source code for the experiments is publicly available in the following link: \url{https://github.com/AliBeikmohammadi/OpenNARS-for-Applications/tree/master/misc/Python}.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2212.12517,
title = {NARS vs. Reinforcement learning: ONA vs. Q-Learning},
author = {Ali Beikmohammadi},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.12517},
year = {2022}
}
Comments
Artificial General Intelligence, 13 pages, 15 figures