English

Multiparticle production in the large lambda n limit: Realising Higgsplosion in a scalar QFT

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2018-06-14 v4 High Energy Physics - Theory

Abstract

In a scalar theory which we use as a simplified model for the Higgs sector, we adopt the semiclassical formalism of Son for computations of nn-particle production cross-sections in the high-multiplicity nn\to \infty weak-coupling λ0\lambda \to 0 regime with the value of λn\lambda n held fixed and large. The approach relies on the use of singular classical solutions to a certain boundary value problem. In the past this formalism has been successfully used and verified in computations of perturbative multi-particle processes at tree-level, and also at the next-to-leading order level in the small λn\lambda n expansion near the multi-particle mass threshold. We apply this singular solutions formalism in the regime of ultra-high multiplicities where λn1\lambda n \gg 1, and compute the leading positive nλn\sim n\,\sqrt{\lambda n} contribution to the exponent of the multi-particle rate in this large λn\lambda n limit. The computation is carried out near the multi-particle mass threshold where the multiplicity nn approaches its maximal value allowed by kinematics. This calculation relies on the idea of Gorsky and Voloshin to use a thin wall approximation for the singular solutions that resemble critical bubbles. This approximation is justified in precisely the high-multiplicity λn\sqrt{\lambda n} \to \infty regime of interest. Based on our results we show that the scalar theory with a spontaneous symmetry breaking used here as a simplified model for the Higgs sector, is very likely to realise the high-energy Higgsplosion phenomenon.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1705.04365,
  title  = {Multiparticle production in the large lambda n limit: Realising Higgsplosion in a scalar QFT},
  author = {Valentin V. Khoze},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.04365},
  year   = {2018}
}

Comments

21 pages, 2 figures, v2: minor corrections, matches version accepted in JHEP, v3: extended discussion below Eq. (4.10), minor corrections, v4: few typos (signs and factors) corrected in intermediate results