English

Multicolor Ramsey Number for Double Stars

Combinatorics 2026-02-12 v2

Abstract

For a graph HH and an integer k1k\ge1, let r(H;k)r(H;k) and r(H;k)r_\ell(H;k) denote the kk-color Ramsey number and list Ramsey number of HH, respectively. Alon, Buci\'c, Kalvari, Kuperwasser and Szab\'o in 2021 initiated the systematic study of list Ramsey numbers of graphs and hypergraphs, and conjectured that r(K1,n;k) r(K_{1,n};k) and r(K1,n;k)r_\ell(K_{1,n};k) are always equal. Motivated by their work, we study the kk-color Ramsey number for double stars S(n,m)S(n,m), where nm1n\ge m\ge1. To the best of our knowledge, little is known on the exact value of r(S(n,m);k)r(S(n,m);k) when k3k\ge3. A classic result of Erd\H{o}s and Graham from 1975 asserts that r(T;k)>k(n1)+1r(T;k)>k(n-1)+1 for every tree TT with n1n\ge 1 edges and kk sufficiently large such that nn divides k1k-1. Using a folklore double counting argument in set system and the edge chromatic number of complete graphs, we prove that if kk is odd and nn is sufficiently large compared with mm and kk, then r(S(n,m);k)=kn+m+2. r(S(n,m);k)=kn+m+2. This is a step in our effort to determine whether r(S(n,m);k)r(S(n,m);k) and r(S(n,m);k)r_\ell(S(n,m);k) are always equal, which remains wide open. We also prove that r(Snm;k)=k(n1)+m+2 r(S^m_n;k)=k(n-1)+m+2 if kk is odd and nn is sufficiently large compared with mm and kk, where 1mn1\le m\le n and SnmS^m_n is obtained from K1,nK_{1, n} by subdividing mm edges each exactly once. We end the paper with some observations towards the list Ramsey number for S(n,m)S(n,m) and SnmS^m_n.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2211.03642,
  title  = {Multicolor Ramsey Number for Double Stars},
  author = {Jake Ruotolo and Zi-Xia Song},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.03642},
  year   = {2026}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-28T05:20:28.197Z