Morphology and Surface Brightness Evolution of z\sim1.1 Radio Galaxies
Astrophysics
2009-10-30 v1
Abstract
We use K−bandimagingtoinvestigatetheangularsizeandmorphologyof106Cradiogalaxies,atredshifts1\leq z\leq 1.4.Twoappeartobeundergoingmergers,anothercontainstwointensitypeaksalignedwiththeradiojets,whiletheothersevenappearconsistentwithbeingnormalellipticalsintheK−band.Intrinsichalf−lightradiiareestimatedfromtheareasofeachradiogalaxyimageaboveaseriesofthresholds.The6Cgalaxyradiiarefoundtobesignificantlysmallerthanthoseofthemoreradioluminous3CRgalaxiesatsimilarredshifts.ThiswouldindicatethatthehighermeanK−bandluminosityofthe3CRgalaxiesresultsfromadifferenceinthesizeofthehostgalaxies,andnotsolelyfromadifferenceinthepoweroftheactivenuclei.Thesize−luminosityrelationofthez\sim 1.16Cgalaxiesindicatesa1.0−−1.8magenhancementoftherest−frameR−bandsurfacebrightnessrelativetoeitherlocalellipticalsofthesamesizeorFRIIradiogalaxiesatz<0.2.The3CRgalaxiesatz\sim 1.1showacomparableenhancementinsurfacebrightness.Themeanradiusofthe6CgalaxiessuggeststhattheyevolveintoellipticalsofL\sim L^*luminosity,andisconsistentwiththeirlowredshiftcounterpartsbeingrelativelysmallFRIIgalaxies,afactor\sim 25lowerinradioluminosity,orsmallFRIgalaxiesafactorof\sim 1000$ lower in radio luminosity. Hence the 6C radio galaxies may undergo at least as much optical and radio evolution as the 3CR galaxies.
Cite
@article{arxiv.astro-ph/9707100,
title = {Morphology and Surface Brightness Evolution of z\sim1.1 Radio Galaxies},
author = {Nathan Roche and Stephen Eales and Steve Rawlings},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:astro-ph/9707100},
year = {2009}
}
Comments
17 pages, 7 postscript figures, TEX, submitted to MNRAS