English

Monotonicity and non-monotonicity of domains of stochastic integral operators

Probability 2007-05-23 v1

Abstract

A L\'evy process on RdR^d with distribution μ\mu at time 1 is denoted by X(μ)={Xt(μ)}X^{(\mu)}=\{X_t^{(\mu)}\}. If the improper stochastic integral 0f(s)dXs(μ)\int_0^{\infty-} f(s)dX_s^{(\mu)} of ff with respect to X(μ)X^{(\mu)} is definable, its distribution is denoted by Φf(μ)\Phi_f(\mu). The class of all infinitely divisible distributions μ\mu on RdR^d such that Φf(μ)\Phi_f(\mu) is definable is denoted by D(Φf)D(\Phi_f). The class D(Φf)D(\Phi_f), its two extensions Dc(Φf)D_c(\Phi_f) and De(Φf)D_e(\Phi_f) (compensated and essential), and its restriction D0(Φf)D^0(\Phi_f) (absolutely definable) are studied. It is shown that De(Φf)D_e(\Phi_f) is monotonic with respect to ff, which means that f2f1|f_2|\leq |f_1| implies De(Φf1)De(Φf2)D_e(\Phi_{f_1})\subset D_e(\Phi_{f_2}). Further, D0(Φf)D^0(\Phi_f) is monotonic with respect to ff but neither D(Φf)D(\Phi_f) nor Dc(Φf)D_c(\Phi_f) is monotonic with respect to ff. Furthermore, there exist μ\mu, f1f_1, and f2f_2 such that 0f2f10\leq f_2\leq f_1, μD(Φf1)\mu\in D(\Phi_{f_1}), and μ∉D(Φf2)\mu\not\in D(\Phi_{f_2}). An explicit example for this is related to some properties of a class of martingale L\'evy processes.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.math/0607288,
  title  = {Monotonicity and non-monotonicity of domains of stochastic integral operators},
  author = {Ken-iti Sato},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:math/0607288},
  year   = {2007}
}

Comments

17 pages