English

Modified gravity interpretation of the evolving dark energy in light of DESI data

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2024-12-02 v2 High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Abstract

The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) collaboration has recently released measurements of baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) from the first year of observations. A joint analysis of DESI BAO, CMB, and SN Ia probes indicates a preference for time-evolving dark energy. We evaluate the robustness of this preference by replacing the DESI distance measurements at z<0.8z<0.8 with the SDSS BAO measurements in a similar redshift range. Assuming the w0waw_0w_aCDM model, we find an evolution of the dark energy equation of state parameters consistent with Λ\LambdaCDM. Our analysis of χ2\chi^2 statistics across various BAO datasets shows that DESI's preference for evolving dark energy is primarily driven by the two LRG samples at zeff=0.51z_{\rm eff}=0.51 and zeff=0.71z_{\rm eff}=0.71, with the latter having the most significant impact. Taking this preference seriously, we study a general Horndeski scalar-tensor theory, which provides a physical mechanism to safely cross the phantom divide, w=1w=-1. Utilizing the Effective Field Theory of dark energy and adopting the w0waw_0w_aCDM background cosmological model, we derive constraints on the parameters w0=0.856±0.062w_0=-0.856\pm0.062 and wa=0.530.26+0.28w_a=-0.53_{-0.26}^{+0.28} at 68%68\% CL from Planck CMB, Planck and ACT CMB lensing, DESI BAO, and Pantheon+ datasets, showing good consistency with the standard w0waw_0w_aCDM model. The modified gravity model gives results discrepant with Λ\LambdaCDM at the 2.4σ2.4\sigma level, while for w0waw_0w_aCDM it is at 2.5σ2.5\sigma, based on the best-fit χ2\chi^2 values. We conclude that modified gravity offers a viable physical explanation for DESI's preference for evolving dark energy.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2407.02558,
  title  = {Modified gravity interpretation of the evolving dark energy in light of DESI data},
  author = {Anton Chudaykin and Martin Kunz},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.02558},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

10+1 pages, 5 figures, 3 tables; v2: model selection analyses added, matched version accepted by Phys. Rev. D