Models of the Chisholm set
Logic in Computer Science
2016-07-11 v1 Logic
Abstract
We give a counter-example showing that Carmo and Jones' condition 5(e) may conflict with other conditions on the models in their paper \emph{A new approach to contrary-to-duty obligations}.
Cite
@article{arxiv.1607.02189,
title = {Models of the Chisholm set},
author = {Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.02189},
year = {2016}
}
Comments
Paper for Filosofi hovedfag spesialomr{\aa}de 1 exam, University of Oslo, Fall 1996. First cited in Carmo and Jones, Deontic logic and contrary-to-duties, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2002, footnote 28